Skip to content

Crystalline Lens and Cataract by Joah F. Aliancy and Nick Mamalis

Crystalline Lens and Cataract

Joah F. Aliancy, MD and Nick Mamalis, MD

 

INTRODUCTION

The lens of the eye is a biconvex, relatively acellular, optically transparent intraocular structure that with the cornea serves to transmit light to the retina with minimal light scattering (Fig. 1a). Early anatomists viewed the lens as the location of meaningful visualization. We now know that this is the function of the retina, with the lens serving as a conduit of light transmission and focus to the retina. The lens can change shape with the aid of the ciliary muscles, thereby changing the focal distance to the retina and bringing the image into sharp focus on the retina. This adjustment of the lens is known as accommodation (similar to the focusing of a photographic camera via movement of its lenses). The lens is more flat on its anterior side than on its posterior side. (Fig. 1b).

 

Fig%201a

Figure 1a. A human eyeball cut in half to show the lens and the passage of light through it from the object ahead to the focus on the retina.

 

Fig 1b

Figure 1b. Histological section of normal crystalline lens (H&E stain, X2). The sectioned iris is shown (iris) but the ciliary body is mostly out of the plane of the section. Notice the lens is flatter anteriorally, facing the cornea (cornea).

 

DEVELOPMENT OF THE LENS

The mature lens originates from surface ectoderm and develops through a highly organized process correlated with the neuroectoderm germ cell layer. Early in embryogenesis the diencephalon, neuroectoderm derived tissue, forms two outpouchings called the optic vesicles. The optic vesicles induce formation of the immature lenticular cells when it comes in contact with surface ectoderm. The immature lenticular cells thicken to form the lens placode. Concurrently, the optic vesicles invaginate causing an indentation on the lens placode called the lens pit (Fig. 2a).

 

 

Fig 2a

Figure 2a. A cartoon to show the development of the eye from the embryonic neural tube, through optic vesicles (1), the invaginated optic cup where the retina is folded back upon the pigment epithelium (2). The developing optic cup induces the lens placode to be formed from the surface ectoderm (2). Finally the lens is pinched off and settles in place with the developing iris and ciliary body in the front of the eyeball (3). rpe; retinal pigment epithelium, on, optic nerve.

 

At this point, the lens vesicle is made up of a single layer of cells enveloped within an outer basement membrane. This basement membrane will eventually form the lens capsule. While encased in the basement membrane, the cells in the posterior pole of the lens vesicle extend anteriorly to form the primary lens fibers (Fig. 2a)

 

Fig 2bFigure 2b. Embryonic lens. Lens vesicle posterior epithelial cells (pec) elongate to form the primary lens fibers (H&E stain, X10).

 

The anterior cells become the lens epithelial cells, while the primary lens fibers collectively form the embryonic nucleus. Subsequently, secondary lens fibers begin to elongate from the lens epithelial cells to form the fetal nucleus during the gestation period and continues to grow multiple layers. As the secondary lens fibers elongate from the equator, they form Y-shaped sutures by meeting anteriorly and posteriorly during fetal growth. The secondary lens fibers eventually grow to form the adult nucleus with new layers of lens fibers forming the lenticular cortex. During lenticular development, the hyaloid artery delivers nutrition and growth factors through the tunica vasculosa lentis, a vascular structure that envelopes the lens nucleus. However, this structure undergoes involution prior to birth to resemble the avascular lens seen in the adult. A firm understanding of the embryology and development of the lens will provide great insight into the pathology associated with cataract formation.

 

 

HISTOLOGY OF THE LENS

Figure 3 shows a stained section of the adult human lens with anterior part of the lens in the top section and the posterior part in the lower section.

 

Fig 3

Figure 3. Layers of the lens. Upper section is through the anterior lens capsule showing lens epithelial cells, lec, and lens fibers, lf. Lower section is of the posterior lens capsule, plc and cortical fibers (cf). (H&E stain, X40).

The lens is composed of 4 structures: capsule, epithelium, cortex and nucleus (Fig. 3). The capsule is the basement membrane with type VI collagen elaborated by the epithelium layer, and stains positively with periodic acid shiff (PAS) stain. It is optically clear and acellular. The lens is held in place by zonular fibers, otherwise known as the zonules of Zinn (Fig. 4). These elastic fibers originate from the nonpigmented epithelium layer of the ciliary body and articulate with the outer layer of the capsule, the capsular lamellar layer. There is a reduction of zonular tension with contraction of the ciliary muscle leading to a more spherical shape allowing focus on more proximal objects. This process is called accommodation.

 

Fig 4

Figure 4. Scanning electron micrograph of zonular fibers. The fibers originate from the nonpigmented epithelium layer of the ciliary body and insert into the lens capsule.

 

The lens epithelium has mitotically active cells that undergo further differentiation via an elongation process, increase in intracellular protein and loss of organelles. These cells are arranged in one layer across the posterior aspect of the anterior capsule. The equatorial bow region of the lens is where lens epithelial cells elongate to form lens fiber cells (Fig.5). Terminal differentiation of the epithelium eventually leads to the fiber layers of both the cortex and nucleus, with older fibers being located more centrally.

 

Fig 5

Figure 5. Lens bow region. Lens epithelial cells (ec) originating from the equatorial region elongate to form new lens fibers (H&E stain, X10).

 

While the nucleus is denser, histologically, there is no distinction between the cortex and nucleus (Fig. 5). The only appreciable difference is age, with older layers located more centrally. Interestingly, as the cortex and nucleus layers grow, the overall diopter strength of the lens increases owing to the increased diameter and curvature of the lens. The lack of organelles within the nucleus and cortex serves to provide an optically clear media for light transmission. The adult lens is almost three times the mass of its corresponding neonatal version, 90 mg to 250 mg.

In the adult, the lens lacks vascularity or innervation thus the metabolic demands of the lens is met by a constant flow of aqueous humor that serves as a conduit for both removal of waste and the delivery of nutrients.

 

CATARACT FORMATION AND TYPES OF CATARACTS

1) CONGENITAL CATARACTS

 

Fig 6

Figure 6. Clinical photograph of an eye with a dilated pupil to show a congenital cataract in the original fetal lens nucleus.

Congenital cataracts are lenticular opacities that cause significant light scattering at birth or noted shortly after (Fig. 6). An estimated 200,000 children worldwide are blind as a result of congenital cataracts, with an incidence of 40,000 in developing countries. [1,2] In regards to laterality, the prevalence appears to be the same for unilateral vs. bilateral. [2] Surgical intervention for both unilateral and bilateral cataract is paramount to prevent long term deprivation amblyopia or visual loss. [3-4] Amblyopia is defined as a dysfunction in visual processing, characterized by poor visual acuity in one or both eyes and abnormal binocular depth perception. [5] While both are critical to detect, the long term severity of bilateral visual deprivation appears to be less than its unilateral counterpart. [6].

The major morphological types of congenital cataracts are categorized as zonular, polar, total and membranous. Congenital zonular cataracts are described as an opacity that is localized in a specific lenticular region. A distinct subtype can occur depending on the time of the injury or developmental error. If the insult occurs during the first 2 months of gestation, then an embryonal nuclear cataract can occur. Injury occurring in the third month of gestation can form a fetal nuclear cataract, characterized by opacities located between the anterior and posterior Y-sutures, and is known as a sutural cataract. A teratologic etiology can explain arborization of a sutural opacity. Polar cataracts are distinct opacities found within the subcapsular cortex in the polar regions, with anterior and posterior subtypes. A Mittendorf dot results when the hyaloid vessel fails to involute. It is characterized as a small, dense white spot on the posterior surface of the lens capsule. The etiology of cataracts during infancy is broad including intrauterine infection, drug-induced, metabolic disorders, trauma, ocular diseases, inherited syndrome and idiopathic.

 

2) NUCLEAR CATARACTS

A common cause of visual impairment in older adults is age-related cataract, which is subcategorized as nuclear, cortical or subcapsular in type. Cumulative incidence of nuclear, cortical and posterior cortical are 29.7%, 22.9% and 8.4% respectively. [7,8] Nuclear cataract is the most common age-related problem (Figs. 7 and 8).

 

Fig 7

Figure 7. Sagittal section of part of the eyeball to show a mature nuclear sclerotic cataract, nsc; retina (retina); cornea, (c).

 

Fig 8

Figure 8. Posterior view of a nuclear sclerotic cataract using the Miyake-Apple technique of removing the back part of the eyeball.

 

With age, nuclear fibers become more compacted and cause increased light scattering. As a result, sclerotic lens nuclei decrease in transparency and result in visual aberrations and annoying glare at night. Clinically, the sclerotic nuclear lens changes in color, from a clear transparent material to yellow or orange, eventually even to brown (brunescent) if left to mature (Fig. 9). Histologically, nuclear sclerotic lenses are characterized by a dense homogenous material.

 

Fig 9

Figure 9. Isolated brunescent cataract. Nuclear sclerotic cataract has a deep brown color with age.

Aging causes the lenticular material to increase in overall size and become more amorphous. As the lens fibers continue to age, the nucleus becomes more compact and less pliable decreasing the ability of the lens to effectively accommodate. The increased coloration is due to protein aggregation in the nuclear lens, decreasing its transparency and leading to various symptoms including visual impairment, decrease in contrast sensitivity, dull color perception and a myopic shift

As the cataract continues to mature, the cortical material begins to liquefy and the nucleus increases in opacity. A hyper-mature cataract is the final stage of the aging process. The liquefied cortex is resorbed, and the dense nucleus sinks within the capsular bag. If left untreated, proteinaceous material can leak across the capsular lining and cause trabecular meshwork (TM) obstruction leading to a phacolytic glaucomatous reaction. This inflammatory reaction is mediated by macrophages that response to the leakage of lenticular protein and contribute to the TM obtruction. Changes within the lens nucleus do not occur independent of the other lenticular structure, instead, cortical subcapsular cataracts may and typically occur simultaneously. However, nuclear sclerotic cataract is by far the most common age-related lenticular opacity.

Figure 10 shows a photograph of a patient’s eye with dense mature cataract that has both nuclear and cortical (see below) components. Obviously the patient was “blind” in this eye, and this cataract needed to be removed to restore sight to the eye.

 

Fig 10

Figure 10. Photograph of a patient’s right eye with a dense mature cataract. Courtesy of James Gilmore, Photography department at the Moran Eye Center.

 

 

3) CORTICAL CATARACTS

As in nuclear sclerotic lens changes, aging can cause similar degenerative changes in the lens cortex. The opacities formed within the lens cortex are quite unique. Sharp clear fluid clefts resemble opaque spokes within the lens cortex, are seen (Figs. 11,12).

Figures 11 and 12 show the typical appearance of cortical cateract shown from the front (Fig. 11) and the back (Fig. 12).

 

Fig 11

Figure 11. Clinical photograph of a cortical cataract with prominent cortical fluid clefts (black lines).

 

Fig 12

Figure 12. Posterior view of a cortical cataract using the Miyake-Apple technique to display the lens. The fluid clefts are obvious (black lines).

Histologically, cortical cataracts are characterized by an accumulation of pink staining eosinophilic fluid between cortical fibers (Fig. 13).

 

Fig 13

Figure 13. Cortical cataract. Histology of early liquified cortical changes displaying accumulation of eosinophilic fluid (pink background) between the lenticular fibers (arrows). (H&E stain, X10).

This fluid accumulation causes shifts between lenticular cells leading to displacement and degeneration of bordering cells. The shift accounts for the spokes seen clinically (Figs 11 and 12). Globules of proteinaceous material, called Morgagnian globules, may be released from the degeneration of the cortical lens cells (Fig. 14). As the cortical cataract continues to mature, the entire cortical region can be replaced by these globules and thus becomes a mature Morgagnian cataract (Fig. 15).

 

Fig 14

Figure 14. Histology of advanced cortical cataract displaying extensive protein breakdown forming Morgagnian globules (Mg, arrows). (H&E stain, X10).

 

Fig 15

Figure 15. Morgagnian cataract. A hypermature cataract with a liquified cortex (c) and a dense nuclear cataract (dnc).

Another characteristic appearance of the cortical cataract is a Christmas tree cataract. This occurs when crystals form within the deep cortex. These crystals are typically composed of cholesterol, lipids, calcium or other compounds. Interestingly, Christmas tree cataracts do not typically cause significant visual impairment.

While a cortical cataract can occur independently of a nuclear sclerotic cataract, biomechanical changes within the lens nucleus can actually induce cataractous changes in the lens cortex. The ability to effectively accommodate decreases with age, in general. The altered biomechanics between the sclerotic nucleus and cortex creates residual sheer stress and results in parallel micro-ridges at the area of lamellar separation. This process helps to explain the histologic patterns seen in cortical cataracts.

 

4) POSTERIOR SUBCAPSULAR CATARACT

Posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSC) develop due to the posterior migration of lens epithelial cells in response to external stimulus. Although most cases are spontaneous, PSC also can develop secondarily to metabolic causes, such as diabetes, inflammation, uveitis, or from long-term topical or systemic corticosteroid use. PSC tend to occur in younger patients and progress more quickly than the other cataract subtypes. The opacity is located at the posterior pole of the lens on the anterior surface of the posterior capsule (Figure 16 and 17).

 

Fig 16

Figure 16. Slit lamp clinical photograph of a focal opacified area (white granular appearance) of posterior subcapsular cataract.

 

Fig 17

Figure 17. Retroillumination clinical photograph of a focal granular area (arrows) of a posterior subcapsular cataract.

An ultrastructural study involving 13 eyes with PSC showed the changes that took place as lens epithelial cells migrate from the equator of the lens to the PSC region. The study concluded that there was a mitotic change as cells migrated towards the posterior pole. The equatorial region cells resembled normal lens epithelial cells but the cells near the PSC showed increased mitotic activity. The authors suggested that the cells were responding to some type of noxious stimuli at the posterior pole. The resultant activity caused the cells to mature into lens fibers or enlarge into bladder-like cells called Wedl cells and the formation of PSC (Fig. 18). The migrating cells probably contribute to cataract formation by secreting extracellular materials, cytolysis, cell dissolution, and possibly release of lysosomal enzymes. [9]

 

 

Fig 18

Figure 18. Bladder cells (bc) or Wedl cells. Swollen lens epithelial cells that have migrated posteriorally to the posterior capsule in a subcapsular cataract (H&E stain, X20).

 

5) ANTERIOR SUBCAPSULAR CATARACT

Anterior subcapsular cataracts (ASC) develop because of the degeneration of anterior lens epithelial cells. They can develop secondary to trauma, medical treatment iatrogenic causes, or spontaneously. The area of damage causes a migration of lens epithelial cells into the area and subsequent transformation of the cells into myofibroblasts in a process known as fibrous metaplasia. This results in an opacity on the anterior surface of the lens beneath the anterior capsule.

 

Fig 19

Figure 19. Electron micrographs of the anterior lens epithelial cells in anterior subcapsular cataract. a) Low magnification view of the anterior epithelial cells lying in basement membrane. X440. b) Higher magnification of spindle-shaped epithelial cells that will form myofibroblasts. BM, basement membrane. X12,000. c) Even higher magnification of the arrowed desmosomal inclusions, D, and calcified granules, CG, in b), which are precursors to fibrosis. X27,500. From  Font, R. and Brownstein, S. 1974.

 

In one of the first studies on ASC, 5 lenses with ASC were examined by light and electron microscopy and confirmed the ability of the lens epithelium to undergo transformation to a fibrous plaque. The lens epithelial cells lost their normal cuboidal shape and elongated into a more spindle-shaped cell (Fig. 19a, b, c). These cells were found frequently to be in contact with one another, resulting in the fibrous plaque known as ASC. This process can be broken down into two phases: a proliferative and a degenerative phase. The proliferative phase was most evident near the periphery of the plaque, showing numerous spindle-shaped cells and mitotically active cells. It is followed by a degenerative phase, which results in an almost structure-less hyaline mass with fewer spindle-shaped cells. [10]

Although the cause of ASC is varied, an association between ASC and the formation of synechiae after trauma or inflammation has been hypothesized. The synechiae would form between the posterior iris and anterior lens capsule, resulting in a stagnation of aqueous humor and accumulation of toxic metabolites that could produce a toxic effect on anterior lens epithelium. [10]

6) TRAUMATIC CATARACT

Direct injury to the head or eye can cause significant mechanical disruption and lead to cataract formation. A Vossius ring can occur if the insult caused the posterior iris pigment epithelium to imprint on the lens capsule. The pigment deposition may abate and resolve completely with time. Severe blunt injury can cause stellate lenticular opacities in the cortex and capsule. Such insult can lead to lens epithelium dysfunction, resulting in a significant edematous response to the superficial cortical lens. Vacuole pockets can then become trapped permanently within the lamellar zone, becoming integrated within the lenticular fibers while new layer are elaborated over the lesion. Alternatively, blunt trauma can also cause cataract formation within all the lenticular layers, leading to a diffuse fibrous metaplasia (Fig. 20). Other forms of trauma that can lead to cataract formation include exposure to radiation, infrared, extreme heat and electrical injury.

 

Fig 20

Figure 20. Traumatic cataract. Extensive anterior fibrous metaplasia (arrows) displaying prominent collagen staining (blue) in a traumatic cataract (Trichrome stain, X20).

 

7) DRUG-INDUCED CATARACT

Several pharmacological agents have been shown to cause cataract formation. Long term corticosteroid therapy and anabolic steroid use are among the most common agents associated with cataract formation, particularly posterior subcapsular cataract. [11] The incidence and severity of PSC is directly related to the dose and duration of use. [12] Interestingly, steroid therapy has become a frequent treatment option in the management of retinal pathologies, and in turns increases the rates of cataract formation. There does not appear to be any distinction between PSC induced by steroid use or a pure age-related PSC. [13] Phenothiazine is another therapeutic agent that can cause lenticular opacities. Psychotropic agents, particularly phenothiazine, induce deposition of pigmented material into the anterior lens epithelium in a very distinct axial configuration [14]. Other pharmaceutical agents known to cause lenticular cataracts include miotics, and amiodarone [15].

 

8) OTHER CAUSES OF CATARACT

While age-related changes remains the leading factor for cataract formation, specifically senile cataract, other contributory factors include smoking, systemic disease, excessive exposure to sunlight and the aforementioned pharmacological agents [16-19].  Many systemic diseases can cause cataracts, such as, diabetes mellitus, hypocalcemia, myotonic dystrophy and Wilson’s disease [19-21]. In diabetic patients, cortical and PSCs appear to occur earlier, particularly among patients with poor glycemic control. Hypocalcemia-induced cataracts usually initiate as small white dot opacities that can coalesce into larger flakes.

Smoking, sun exposure and systemic disease management are modifiable risk factors, so taking measures to changes these factors can delay the onset and progression of cataract formation. Phytonutrients, such as xanthophyll carotenoids, lutein and zeaxanthin may play a potential role in limiting or neutralizing light induced oxidative changes within the lens [22]. Currently, there are several ongoing studies evaluating other possible protective agents. Although there is no definitive measure to prevent cataract formation, cataract surgery remains an extremely safe and highly successful intervention.

CATARACT SURGERY

 

Two videos showing cataract surgical procedures from the anterior and posterior views of the anterior segment of the human eye.

From the anterior view (mp4 file).

 

From the posterior view (mp4 file).

Surgery for cataracts has undergone extensive evolution. Ancient knowledge viewed the cataratous eye as an imbalance of humors that needed displacement to recover vision. Using a needle, the surgeon would proceed to displace the abnormal humor until the crystalline lens dislocated. Modern cataract surgery has undergone significant changes and is now characterized by several steps: corneal incision, continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis (CCC), hydrodissection, phacoemulsification, cortical aspiration, and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Earlier surgical intervention to remove the entire cataractous lens required a 12 mm incision with subsequent suture closure. However, a small 2.4 to 2.8 mm wide clear corneal incision is enough to facilitate entry of the phaco handpiece while remaining sutureless for closure. The CCC technique was developed by Gimbel and Neuhann in the 1980s and truly revolutionized the phacoemulsification technique [16]. CCC involves creating a tear in the anterior capsule then continuing the tear in a circular continuous fashion while minimizing shear forces exerted on the zonular fibers. After creation of the CCC, phacoemulsification is used to fragment and emulsify both the cortical and nuclear material. Originally pioneered by Kelman in 1967, phacoemulsification remains a vital part of cataract surgery [17,18]. The CCC opening is large enough to allow implantation of the entire optic and haptics of an intraocular lens (IOL) within the remnant lens capsular bag. The prior use of non-foldable polymethylmethacrylate lenses required a relatively large clear corneal incision for implantation. However, the development of the foldable silicone and acrylic IOLs allowed insertion through a small incision mostly less than 4.0 mm in length. Innovation is constantly improving these steps of cataract surgery, from novel IOLs with unique design to minimize the corneal incision, to use of the femtosecond laser to create an automated corneal incision, CCC and to fragment the nucleus prior to aspiration. [19,20]

 

Details of the types of intraocular lenses, that are presently being used in cataract surgery, are presented in the following chapter in webvision by Jason Nguyen, and Liliana Werner.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Foster, A. et al. 1997. Epidemiology of cataract in childhood: A global perspective. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 23, (1997), 601–604. [PubMed]

[2] Sheeladevi et al. 2016. Global prevalence of childhood cataract: a systematic review. Eye. 30, 9 (2016), 1160–1169. [PubMed]

[3] Birch, E. et al. 2009. The critical period for surgical treatment of dense congenital bilateral cataracts. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 13, 1 (2009), 67–71. [PubMed]

[4] Birch, E. 1996. The critical period for surgical treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 122, 5 (1996), 759. [PubMed]

[5] Holmes, J.M. and Clarke, M.P. 2006. Amblyopia. Lancet (London, England). 367, 9519 (Apr. 2006), 1343–1351. [PubMed]

[6] Birch, E. et al. 1998. Early treatment of congenital unilateral cataract minimizes unequal competition. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences. 39, 9 (Aug. 1998), 1560–1566. [PubMed]

7] Klein, B. et al. 2008. Incidence of Age-Related Cataract over a 15-Year Interval. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 115, 3 (2008), 477–482. [PubMed]

[8] West SK, Valmadrid CT. 1995. Epidemiology of risk factors for age-related cataract. Survey of Ophthalmology. 39, 4 (1995), 323–334. [PubMed]

[9] Streeten, B.W. 1978. Human Posterior Subcapsular Cataract. Archives of Ophthalmology. 96, 9 (Jan. 1978), 1653. [PubMed]

[10] Font, R. and Brownstein, S. 1974. A Light and Electron Microscopic Study of Anterior Subcapsular Cataracts. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 78, 6 (1974), 972–984. [PubMed]

[11] Urban, R.C. and Cotlier, E. 1986. Corticosteroid-induced cataracts. Survey of Ophthalmology. 31, 2 (1986), 102–110. [PubMed]

[12] Mcgraw, B.F. and Rollins, C.L. 1979. Topical-Corticosteroid-Induced Cataracts. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 13, 9 (Jan. 1979), 537–538.

[13] Havre, D.C. 1965. Cataracts in Children on Long-Term Corticosteroid Therapy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 73, 6 (Jan. 1965), 818–821. [PubMed]

[14] Isaac, N.E. 1991. Exposure to Phenothiazine Drugs and Risk of Cataract. Archives of Ophthalmology. 109, 2 (Jan. 1991), 256. [PubMed]

[15] Abraham and Teller 1969. Influence of various miotics on cataract formation. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 53, 12 (1969), 833–838. [PubMed]

[16] Gimbel, H.V. and Neuhann, T. 1991. Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 17, 1 (1991), 110–111.

[17] Kelman, C.D. 1979. Phacoemulsification in the Anterior Chamber. Ophthalmology. 86, 11 (1979), 1980–1982. [PubMed]

[18] Kelman, C.D. 1994. The History and Development of Phacoemulsification. International Ophthalmology Clinics. 34, 2 (1994), 1–12. [PubMed]

[19] Nagy, Z. et al. 2009. Initial Clinical Evaluation of an Intraocular Femtosecond Laser in Cataract Surgery. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 25, 12 (Jan. 2009), 1053–1060. [PubMed]

[20] Roberts, T.V. et al. 2013. Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Femtosecond Laser Cataract Surgery. Ophthalmology. 120, 2 (2013), 227–233. [PubMed]

 

 

About the authors

 

Joah Aliancy

Joah F. Aliancy, MD, originally from Haiti, received his undergraduate degree from the University of South Florida in Chemistry with honors distinction and his medical degree from Florida State University. Presently he is an ocular pathology research fellow at the John A. Moran Eye Center. In a year, Dr. Aliancy will attend the Harkness Eye Institute at Columbia University for his ophthalmology residency training. His research interests include novel intraocular lens technology, mechanisms to decrease capsular lens opacification, toxic anterior segment syndrome and nitric oxide as a treatment modality in glaucomatous disease. He has been honored with induction into both Alpha Omega Alpha and Gold Humanism Honor societies and recipient of the National Medical Association Rabb-Venable Award. Dr. Aliancy can be contacted at joah.aliancy@utah.edu

 

Nick Mammalis

Nick Mamalis is a Professor of Ophthalmology at the John A. Moran Eye Center of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah.  He received his BA in Biochemistry from Harvard University and his MD from the University of Utah, School of Medicine.  After a fellowship in Ophthalmic Pathology at the University of Utah he completed his residency in Ophthalmology at Loyola University Medical Center.  He is currently the Director of Ophthalmic Pathology as well as the co-Director of the Intermountain Ocular Research Center at the University of Utah. He is the Editor of the Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery as well as a member of the Cataract Clinical Committee and the Executive Committee of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS).  Dr. Mamalis is a former President of the Utah Ophthalmology Society.  He was given the American Academy of Ophthalmology Honor Award in 1994, Senior Achievement Award in 2005, and a Life Achievement Honor in 2015. He was the recipient of the Brinkhorst Medal of Honor in 2013 by the ASCRS.  He is known nationally and internationally and has published over 200 peer review journal articles and has written multiple textbooks and textbook chapters. Dr. Mamalis can be contacted at nick.mamalis@hsc.utah.edu